• strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_node_status::operator_form() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::operator_form(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/modules/node/views_handler_filter_node_status.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/glencoenews/www/www/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.

Obamacare, MNsure are failing Minnesotans

Earlier this month the Commerce Department released the individual insurance rates for 2016. This includes rates on the MNsure exchange, as well as those who purchase individual plans.
 
When Democrats brought Obamacare to Minnesota they promised a system that would increase choice, decrease cost, and that Minnesotans would be able to keep plans and doctors that they liked.
 
Instead, we’re seeing the opposite. Rates are going to rise for plans in 2016 between 14 and 49 percent, with a plurality of consumers on the individual market seeing increases of 45 percent or more. MNsure will no longer offer platinum-level plans, meaning headaches, hassles, and possibly higher prices if those with platinum plans want to stay on their current plan.
 
Prices have continued to rise dramatically for the past two years under Obamacare. Since 2014, average monthly premiums for a family of four in southeastern Minnesota with a gold plan have risen $695 additional per month, and $376 for families in southern Minnesota. Gold-plan premiums for a 40-year-old in southwestern Minnesota have increased $154 per month.
 
These shocking increases are a far cry from promises made by Democrats, who said people could save $500 per year, and that some families could save well over $1,000 per year.
 
Simply put, MNsure and Obamacare have failed Minnesotans and are causing more hassle and headaches for people simply trying to make a living and comply with federally mandated insurance requirements. It’s well past time to pull the plug on MNsure so we can at least save taxpayers from having to spend millions more on this duplicative program. The federal exchange can provide the same features as a state exchange, without millions of dollars from Minnesota taxpayers.
 
I strongly urge Gov. Dayton to continue pushing for the federal government to grant us a waiver that allows Minnesotans to access health credits outside of MNsure. Why should Minnesotans eligible for tax credits only be able to access those credits by using the exchange? If they find a plan outside the exchange that fits their needs, there’s no reason we should restrict those options.
 
I anticipate many more discussions throughout the rest of the interim and into next session on how we can address MNsure moving forward. We need to admit on a bipartisan basis that the system isn’t working, and roll up our sleeves and come up with meaningful solutions to fix it.